Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;moreotherstuff, post: 258625, member: 56&quot;]I&#039;d go with this being a fake mark for 3 reasons: first, while it does resemble the 1804-9 imperial mark, every reference to that mark that I see specifies a simple letter M, not any kind of contraction, secondly the lettering style is different, and finally (and even more importantly) the quality simply does not seem to be there.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in