Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain
>
Tiles painted and big
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="KylieS, post: 4514684, member: 22292"]My feeling is that these are recently painted on reclaimed (or repurposed) tiles. </p><p><br /></p><p>I'm pretty interested in architecture and pottery, I've never seen or heard of an Italian roof tile being decorated in this way - wall tiles yes but not on roofs. (Who would see it?)</p><p><br /></p><p>Also you have to overlap roof tiles to make a roof watertight, which is still the usual way of doing things in Tuscany, so these designs with essential parts of the design worked right to the edge make no sense from that perspective. A quarter to a third would be covered as the photo of the undecorated tile roof shows.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, really just a feeling, but I also think that the face of the woman is modern, not 16th / 17th C. The line work around the nose seems a little...casual? The quick flourish lines seem to owe a debt to fashion illustration / graphic design, so it doesn't seem like it's in the right place on the art continuum to be very old...and the eyebrows...hmmm. But just a feeling on that. </p><p><br /></p><p>Hope you find your definitive answer soon <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="KylieS, post: 4514684, member: 22292"]My feeling is that these are recently painted on reclaimed (or repurposed) tiles. I'm pretty interested in architecture and pottery, I've never seen or heard of an Italian roof tile being decorated in this way - wall tiles yes but not on roofs. (Who would see it?) Also you have to overlap roof tiles to make a roof watertight, which is still the usual way of doing things in Tuscany, so these designs with essential parts of the design worked right to the edge make no sense from that perspective. A quarter to a third would be covered as the photo of the undecorated tile roof shows. Also, really just a feeling, but I also think that the face of the woman is modern, not 16th / 17th C. The line work around the nose seems a little...casual? The quick flourish lines seem to owe a debt to fashion illustration / graphic design, so it doesn't seem like it's in the right place on the art continuum to be very old...and the eyebrows...hmmm. But just a feeling on that. Hope you find your definitive answer soon :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain
>
Tiles painted and big
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...