Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Bronwen, post: 10341884, member: 5833&quot;]What I thought was wild was that the correction to the original correction only changed the revised date by a couple of years, a difference of importance mainly to scholars, with no real bearing on the value of the work.&nbsp; I thought they were going to reveal that the signature was a forgery, that some architectural feature wasn&#039;t there until after the artist died.&nbsp; It did, at least, move the date of creation back a bit from the artist&#039;s death.&nbsp; I thought the first revision was cutting it fine on that score.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in