Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;DragonflyWink, post: 11455940, member: 111&quot;]Well, you would certainly recognize <i>&quot;ranting, raving, and foaming at the mouth&quot;</i>, since you seem so adept at it, apparently so incensed by what you&#039;ve perceived as insults to your <i>&quot;own knowledge and personal character&quot; </i>that you angrily and unfairly raged at the entire forum.&nbsp; Despite your warning to refrain from replying, everyone here, regardless of their opinion, certainly has that right and have to wonder why anyone would feel entitled to suggest otherwise.</p><p><br /></p><p>Wouldn&#039;t want you to be deprived of your <i>&quot;glee in providing actual verifiable facts&quot; </i>and proving that it is<i> &quot;undoubtedly and indisputedly </i>[<i>sic</i>]<i> a Whiting and Davis piece&quot;, </i>so please have at it.&nbsp; Might keep in mind that there are errors in many reference sources and sales descriptions are quite often just wrong (including a lot of &#039;unmarked&#039; Whiting &amp; Davis pieces that are clearly not of expected quality).&nbsp; Factual evidence should be something like proof that Whiting &amp; Davis registered that oval mark (it&#039;s not present in the U.S. trademark registry), or an advertisement or catalog page showing the same bracelet, or perhaps the same bracelet bearing a proper Whiting &amp; Davis mark, or even an &#039;<i>Oromesh</i>&#039; mark, a registered trademark they started using in the early &#039;50s...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in