Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Antique Discussion
>
Wooden Mask Identification
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="all_fakes, post: 971156, member: 55"]JD makes good points; I might mention that is best to approach the "holes/no holes" issue with some knowledge of the particular culture; some cultures traditionally have holes through the eyes; others might have holes or slits near the eyes.</p><p>In particular, larger Northwest Coast Native masks made for native use will usually not have eyeholes, and are an exception to the rule that lack of eyeholes means non-authentic. Smaller ones may have eyeholes and a "shelf" that the wearer grips in his teeth; others may be hand-held over the face; but larger ones are usually danced "blind," requiring an assistant who leads the dancer around.</p><p>These big ones may weigh 40 pounds, and are generally balanced on the wearer's head and shoulders by a cord running from the back of the mask to the wearer's belt; and one can judge authenticity or possibly even "has been danced" by the presence of the necessary padding and belt-rigging.</p><p>Many Northwest Coast artists will carve items intended only for display, sale to collectors; and my own practice is to refer to these as masks, if the artist does so; even though intended only for wall-hanging.</p><p> In the artists mind, the distinction is not whether they have eye-holes or not, or whether they are called "masks" or not; the distinction is that some items are carved for sale to collectors, and for wall-hanging; others are made for use by those natives who are entitled to the crests they represent, and have inherited the right to the dances that they will be used in. One can't always tell that difference by viewing the mask itself, though sometimes, if lucky, there might be provenance available, or even a listing of the dances where the mask has been used.</p><p>But I digress....it is indeed true that for many cultures, a mask intended to be worn will have eyeholes; one intended for décor will not. In those cultures, the eyes are certainly a useful diagnostic feature.</p><p>But because this particular "mask" is too small to be worn, any eye-holes will be purely decorative, and not an indication of "authenticity."[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="all_fakes, post: 971156, member: 55"]JD makes good points; I might mention that is best to approach the "holes/no holes" issue with some knowledge of the particular culture; some cultures traditionally have holes through the eyes; others might have holes or slits near the eyes. In particular, larger Northwest Coast Native masks made for native use will usually not have eyeholes, and are an exception to the rule that lack of eyeholes means non-authentic. Smaller ones may have eyeholes and a "shelf" that the wearer grips in his teeth; others may be hand-held over the face; but larger ones are usually danced "blind," requiring an assistant who leads the dancer around. These big ones may weigh 40 pounds, and are generally balanced on the wearer's head and shoulders by a cord running from the back of the mask to the wearer's belt; and one can judge authenticity or possibly even "has been danced" by the presence of the necessary padding and belt-rigging. Many Northwest Coast artists will carve items intended only for display, sale to collectors; and my own practice is to refer to these as masks, if the artist does so; even though intended only for wall-hanging. In the artists mind, the distinction is not whether they have eye-holes or not, or whether they are called "masks" or not; the distinction is that some items are carved for sale to collectors, and for wall-hanging; others are made for use by those natives who are entitled to the crests they represent, and have inherited the right to the dances that they will be used in. One can't always tell that difference by viewing the mask itself, though sometimes, if lucky, there might be provenance available, or even a listing of the dances where the mask has been used. But I digress....it is indeed true that for many cultures, a mask intended to be worn will have eyeholes; one intended for décor will not. In those cultures, the eyes are certainly a useful diagnostic feature. But because this particular "mask" is too small to be worn, any eye-holes will be purely decorative, and not an indication of "authenticity."[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Antique Discussion
>
Wooden Mask Identification
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...